The panoramic shot of Dubai by photographer Gerald Donovan.
The world record for the largest digital photograph now belongs to a massive image of Dubai. Nearly doubling the previous record-holder, photographer Gerald Donovan’s photo is a whopping 45 gigapixels and, if printed out, would be big enough to cover 1,200 billboards.
Using the GigaPan EPIC Pro robotic camera, which was designed according to technology used by NASA’s Mars Rover, Donovan took over 4,000 pictures during a 4-hour marathon shoot, then patched all the photos together to create one gargantuan image.
“This was intended as a technical test,” said Donovan said in a press release. “It was about exploring the limits of the hardware and software out there.”
In the image itself, which you can see at GigaPan.org, you can zoom in on the world’s tallest building, Burj Khailfa, along with hundreds of other structures in the city of Dubai. The image has good clarity, though Donovan says the city’s poor air quality is to blame for the fact that it looks slightly muddled.
잉… 이렇게도 연동되는거야~~ @____@);; 쉐어가 제대로 되는걸~~
잉… 이렇게도 연동되는거야~~ @____@);; 쉐어가 제대로 되는걸~~
[…] A Photograph the Size of 1,200 Billboards | Silber Studios The world record for the largest digital photograph now belongs to a massive image of Dubai. Nearly doubling the previous record-holder, photographer Gerald Donovan’s photo is a whopping 45 gigapixels and, if printed out, would be big enough to cover 1,200 billboards. (tags: photograph largest) […]
[…] A Photograph the Size of 1,200 Billboards | Silber Studios The world record for the largest digital photograph now belongs to a massive image of Dubai. Nearly doubling the previous record-holder, photographer Gerald Donovan’s photo is a whopping 45 gigapixels and, if printed out, would be big enough to cover 1,200 billboards. (tags: photograph largest) […]
There are all kinds of bizarre artifacts, bulging, twisting and blurring in this image.
I do not see what is impressive about this very poorly executed monster file.
There are all kinds of bizarre artifacts, bulging, twisting and blurring in this image.
I do not see what is impressive about this very poorly executed monster file.
I would suggest, though that this is nothing particularly spectacular. Given time and patience an average user with an average point and shoot could accomplish the same simply by using the same idea of stiching.
On the other hand, the pinhole photo shot using a hangar in a disused airbase, shot onto a massive negative – hand painted by volunteers and prepared over a period of a few weeks – would certainly qualify as spectacular. Because that WAS a single photo, exposed, printed and developed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinhole_camera
http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/photographers/the-worlds-largest-pinhole-photograph
And the additional spectacular quality – the technology wasn’t in any way new or being pushed to it’s boundaries.
I would suggest, though that this is nothing particularly spectacular. Given time and patience an average user with an average point and shoot could accomplish the same simply by using the same idea of stiching.
On the other hand, the pinhole photo shot using a hangar in a disused airbase, shot onto a massive negative – hand painted by volunteers and prepared over a period of a few weeks – would certainly qualify as spectacular. Because that WAS a single photo, exposed, printed and developed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinhole_camera
http://www.alternativephotography.com/wp/photographers/the-worlds-largest-pinhole-photograph
And the additional spectacular quality – the technology wasn’t in any way new or being pushed to it’s boundaries.